Title
Priority
(Normally leave blank. Articles with numeric priorities are placed in order at the top of the page. Examples: 1, 2.5)
Expiration
(The article will be automatically archived on this date.)
Content
Categories
(Use existing categories when possible. Separate categories with commas.)
Image Upload
Image position:

Event date (Leave event fields blank if this is not an event announcement.)
Event time
Event end date
Event end time
Event location
Event color
Sample
 
This event recurs every until .
This is not a recurring event.

UsernameForgot username
PasswordForgot password
We will send you an email immediately to which you must respond
within one hour to complete your registration.
Your login name will be your first name and last name separated
with a space.
Your first name
Your last name
Your street address
Your city
Your state
Your zipcode
Your phone number
Your email address
 
Choose a password
Confirm your password
 
You can change your account settings or delete your account here.
Username
Street address
City
State
Zipcode
Phone
Email address
New Password
Confirm New Password
 
Edit  DeletePriority 1Expires Dec 5, 2017

 

A California bill that would require more disclosure about donors in campaign ads is nearing passage, after seven years of attempts by proponents.

The "California Disclose Act" requires most campaign ads to display their top three funders, even if those contributions were funneled through other generically-named committees.

The author of this year's bill's, Democratic Assemblyman Kevin Mullin, said at a rally that the measure has the votes to pass.

"For the first time it appears we have a deal within the Legislature to move a real reform bill to the governor," Mullin said. "Let me tell you that the moment is indeed at hand."

An amendment inserted Wednesday could allow certain contributors, including labor unions and business groups, to avoid revealing their top funders. Trent Lange of the California Clean Money Campaign, the bill's main proponent, says the amendment helped secure the deal.

The bill failed last year by one vote in the state Senate. The conservative Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association opposed the measure, as did the California Fair Political Practice Commission, which monitors campaign finance in the state. The FPPC said the it contained confusing language and could complicate enforcement. After changes in this year's bill, the agency has remained neutral.

Nancy Abbey2017-11-05T21:40:31Z
Login to leave a comment.
Leave a comment
File Upload
 
Use rich text editor

Multiple item entry (Return separates items)